Changes
On April 5, 2024 at 5:59:15 PM UTC, Rosemary:
-
Updated description of resource Implications of Alternate Silvicultural Strategies in Mountain Pine Beetle Damaged Stands in Implications of Alternate Silvicultural Strategies in Mountain Pine Beetle Damaged Stands from
Technical report titled “Implications of Alternative Silvicultural Strategies in Mountain Pine Beetle Damaged Stands” prepared in 2005.
toThis technical report, prepared in 2005, incorporates robust snag dynamics into SORTIE-ND to predict impacts of silviculture strategies on mountain pine beetle (MPB) attacked stands.
f | 1 | { | f | 1 | { |
2 | "author": "K. D. Coates, E. C. Hall", | 2 | "author": "K. D. Coates, E. C. Hall", | ||
3 | "author_email": null, | 3 | "author_email": null, | ||
4 | "creator_user_id": "b8ce6af0-837f-4d76-bb04-77e7caac7437", | 4 | "creator_user_id": "b8ce6af0-837f-4d76-bb04-77e7caac7437", | ||
5 | "funding_agency": "", | 5 | "funding_agency": "", | ||
6 | "groups": [ | 6 | "groups": [ | ||
7 | { | 7 | { | ||
8 | "description": "This collection houses work done by researcher | 8 | "description": "This collection houses work done by researcher | ||
9 | Dr. Dave Coates. \r\n\r\nCoates has a BSF (UBC), M.Sc. (Oregon State | 9 | Dr. Dave Coates. \r\n\r\nCoates has a BSF (UBC), M.Sc. (Oregon State | ||
10 | University) and Ph.D (UBC) in silviculture and forest ecology. He has | 10 | University) and Ph.D (UBC) in silviculture and forest ecology. He has | ||
11 | lived in Smithers since 1979 and he has held the position of Research | 11 | lived in Smithers since 1979 and he has held the position of Research | ||
12 | Silviculturist with the B.C. Forest Service since 1989. He is the | 12 | Silviculturist with the B.C. Forest Service since 1989. He is the | ||
13 | leader of the Date Creek silvicultural systems experiment; an | 13 | leader of the Date Creek silvicultural systems experiment; an | ||
14 | internationally recognized forest dynamics experiment that has | 14 | internationally recognized forest dynamics experiment that has | ||
15 | integrated silviculture with forest ecology and provided silvicultural | 15 | integrated silviculture with forest ecology and provided silvicultural | ||
16 | solutions for biodiversity problems. He is also a lead developer of | 16 | solutions for biodiversity problems. He is also a lead developer of | ||
17 | the complex\r\nstand dynamics simulator SORTIE-ND.", | 17 | the complex\r\nstand dynamics simulator SORTIE-ND.", | ||
18 | "display_name": "Dave Coates", | 18 | "display_name": "Dave Coates", | ||
19 | "id": "8e7e7380-dcba-4beb-9ec4-0ba1d79b4b55", | 19 | "id": "8e7e7380-dcba-4beb-9ec4-0ba1d79b4b55", | ||
20 | "image_display_url": | 20 | "image_display_url": | ||
21 | t/ii/profile.image/273665140981774-1442258262315_Q512/K-Coates-2.jpg", | 21 | t/ii/profile.image/273665140981774-1442258262315_Q512/K-Coates-2.jpg", | ||
22 | "name": "dave-coates", | 22 | "name": "dave-coates", | ||
23 | "title": "Dave Coates" | 23 | "title": "Dave Coates" | ||
24 | }, | 24 | }, | ||
25 | { | 25 | { | ||
26 | "description": "The Mountain Pine Beetle is a destructive insect | 26 | "description": "The Mountain Pine Beetle is a destructive insect | ||
27 | that has had a significant impact on the forests of North America, | 27 | that has had a significant impact on the forests of North America, | ||
28 | particularly in western regions. This small beetle has led to | 28 | particularly in western regions. This small beetle has led to | ||
29 | widespread tree mortality, most notably in Lodgepole Pine.\r\n\r\nThis | 29 | widespread tree mortality, most notably in Lodgepole Pine.\r\n\r\nThis | ||
30 | is a collection of datasets with information regarding the Mountain | 30 | is a collection of datasets with information regarding the Mountain | ||
31 | Pine Beetle, and the forest management and ecosystem recovery efforts | 31 | Pine Beetle, and the forest management and ecosystem recovery efforts | ||
32 | as a result of its impacts.", | 32 | as a result of its impacts.", | ||
33 | "display_name": "Mountain Pine Beetle", | 33 | "display_name": "Mountain Pine Beetle", | ||
34 | "id": "8da2dd5e-68ce-492a-81ca-3fe06e68ed1b", | 34 | "id": "8da2dd5e-68ce-492a-81ca-3fe06e68ed1b", | ||
35 | "image_display_url": | 35 | "image_display_url": | ||
36 | rcan/files/forest/MountainPineBeetleDendroctonusponderosae1000px.jpg", | 36 | rcan/files/forest/MountainPineBeetleDendroctonusponderosae1000px.jpg", | ||
37 | "name": "mountain-pine-beetle", | 37 | "name": "mountain-pine-beetle", | ||
38 | "title": "Mountain Pine Beetle" | 38 | "title": "Mountain Pine Beetle" | ||
39 | } | 39 | } | ||
40 | ], | 40 | ], | ||
41 | "id": "c5cf39c1-f4d2-44a4-930a-77d35e19fffe", | 41 | "id": "c5cf39c1-f4d2-44a4-930a-77d35e19fffe", | ||
42 | "institution": "Bulkley Valley Research Centre, British Columbia | 42 | "institution": "Bulkley Valley Research Centre, British Columbia | ||
43 | Forest Service", | 43 | Forest Service", | ||
44 | "isopen": true, | 44 | "isopen": true, | ||
45 | "license_id": "cc-by", | 45 | "license_id": "cc-by", | ||
46 | "license_title": "Creative Commons Attribution", | 46 | "license_title": "Creative Commons Attribution", | ||
47 | "license_url": "http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by", | 47 | "license_url": "http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by", | ||
48 | "maintainer": "", | 48 | "maintainer": "", | ||
49 | "maintainer_email": null, | 49 | "maintainer_email": null, | ||
50 | "metadata_created": "2024-03-21T21:23:13.532532", | 50 | "metadata_created": "2024-03-21T21:23:13.532532", | ||
n | 51 | "metadata_modified": "2024-04-05T17:57:29.049622", | n | 51 | "metadata_modified": "2024-04-05T17:59:15.685718", |
52 | "name": | 52 | "name": | ||
53 | nate-silvicultural-strategies-in-mountain-pine-beetle-damaged-stands", | 53 | nate-silvicultural-strategies-in-mountain-pine-beetle-damaged-stands", | ||
54 | "notes": "**ABSTRACT**\r\n\r\nIn this project, we incorporated a | 54 | "notes": "**ABSTRACT**\r\n\r\nIn this project, we incorporated a | ||
55 | robust snag dynamics submodel into SORTIE-\u00adND, a version of the | 55 | robust snag dynamics submodel into SORTIE-\u00adND, a version of the | ||
56 | spatially explicit, individual tree model SORTIE (Pacala et al. 1996; | 56 | spatially explicit, individual tree model SORTIE (Pacala et al. 1996; | ||
57 | Coates et al. 2003), to predict impacts of silviculture strategies on | 57 | Coates et al. 2003), to predict impacts of silviculture strategies on | ||
58 | mountain pine beetle (MPB) attacked stands.\r\n\r\nFor modelling | 58 | mountain pine beetle (MPB) attacked stands.\r\n\r\nFor modelling | ||
59 | purposes we selected four stand types from the SBSdk subzone to | 59 | purposes we selected four stand types from the SBSdk subzone to | ||
60 | represent MPB susceptible stand types: Pine Minor Spruce, Mixed | 60 | represent MPB susceptible stand types: Pine Minor Spruce, Mixed | ||
61 | Pine\u2013Spruce, Spruce Minor Pine, and Pine Dominant. We estimated | 61 | Pine\u2013Spruce, Spruce Minor Pine, and Pine Dominant. We estimated | ||
62 | light transmission by lodgepole pine snags, developed a model to | 62 | light transmission by lodgepole pine snags, developed a model to | ||
63 | predict snag fall down rates, and assumed levels of pine mortality, | 63 | predict snag fall down rates, and assumed levels of pine mortality, | ||
64 | natural regeneration rates, and under\u00adplanting | 64 | natural regeneration rates, and under\u00adplanting | ||
65 | densities.\r\n\r\nSimulation results showed that the light environment | 65 | densities.\r\n\r\nSimulation results showed that the light environment | ||
66 | in the understory of recently killed lodgepole pine stands is too low | 66 | in the understory of recently killed lodgepole pine stands is too low | ||
67 | for survival of pine seedlings. This is a very different regeneration | 67 | for survival of pine seedlings. This is a very different regeneration | ||
68 | environment than found after wildfire. Beetle killed pine snags block | 68 | environment than found after wildfire. Beetle killed pine snags block | ||
69 | considerable light for at least 10 years after their death. After | 69 | considerable light for at least 10 years after their death. After | ||
70 | these first years, the growth rate of pine under the snags accelerates | 70 | these first years, the growth rate of pine under the snags accelerates | ||
71 | until it approaches the growth rate anticipated from pine in open | 71 | until it approaches the growth rate anticipated from pine in open | ||
72 | conditions. This change in growth rate reflects the shift in light | 72 | conditions. This change in growth rate reflects the shift in light | ||
73 | conditions as snags deteriorate with increasingly open conditions | 73 | conditions as snags deteriorate with increasingly open conditions | ||
74 | being created. \r\n\r\nWe were unable to predict the extent of natural | 74 | being created. \r\n\r\nWe were unable to predict the extent of natural | ||
75 | regeneration in the four selected stand types due to lack of data to | 75 | regeneration in the four selected stand types due to lack of data to | ||
76 | parameterize the recruitment submodel, however, we have a 2005/07 FSP | 76 | parameterize the recruitment submodel, however, we have a 2005/07 FSP | ||
77 | funded study to address this short\u00adcoming. | 77 | funded study to address this short\u00adcoming. | ||
78 | None\u00adthe\u00adless, shading by MPB killed snags is severe in the | 78 | None\u00adthe\u00adless, shading by MPB killed snags is severe in the | ||
79 | first years after MPB attack and may greatly limit regeneration | 79 | first years after MPB attack and may greatly limit regeneration | ||
80 | success.\r\n\r\nSORTIE-\u00adND predictions of growth of pine or | 80 | success.\r\n\r\nSORTIE-\u00adND predictions of growth of pine or | ||
81 | spruce plantations after total salvage were very similar to TASS | 81 | spruce plantations after total salvage were very similar to TASS | ||
82 | predictions (based on TIPSY v3.2 runs). SORTIE-\u00adND subalpine fir | 82 | predictions (based on TIPSY v3.2 runs). SORTIE-\u00adND subalpine fir | ||
83 | plantations grew slower than those projected by TASS.\r\n\r\nThree of | 83 | plantations grew slower than those projected by TASS.\r\n\r\nThree of | ||
84 | the four selected stand types had variable levels of residual spruce | 84 | the four selected stand types had variable levels of residual spruce | ||
85 | in the overstory, the understory, or both. Simulation results showed | 85 | in the overstory, the understory, or both. Simulation results showed | ||
86 | that, after pine mortality, the spruce in these stand types released | 86 | that, after pine mortality, the spruce in these stand types released | ||
87 | and grew well, resulting in well stocked stands with good basal areas. | 87 | and grew well, resulting in well stocked stands with good basal areas. | ||
88 | Two of the stand types recovered to pre\u00adattack basal areas within | 88 | Two of the stand types recovered to pre\u00adattack basal areas within | ||
89 | 50 years, the\r\nthird by 80 years. These stand types can help | 89 | 50 years, the\r\nthird by 80 years. These stand types can help | ||
90 | mitigate mid\u00adterm (30\u00ad50 years) timber supply shortages if | 90 | mitigate mid\u00adterm (30\u00ad50 years) timber supply shortages if | ||
91 | left unsalvaged or protected during partial salvage. The Pine Dominant | 91 | left unsalvaged or protected during partial salvage. The Pine Dominant | ||
92 | stand type with little residual spruce did not recover; either salvage | 92 | stand type with little residual spruce did not recover; either salvage | ||
93 | and planting or under\u00adplanting would be required. | 93 | and planting or under\u00adplanting would be required. | ||
94 | \r\n\r\nModeling planting of the Pine Dominant stand type with either | 94 | \r\n\r\nModeling planting of the Pine Dominant stand type with either | ||
95 | spruce or subalpine fir shortly after MPB attack showed substantial | 95 | spruce or subalpine fir shortly after MPB attack showed substantial | ||
96 | yield increase at 100 years. The benefit of under-planting stand types | 96 | yield increase at 100 years. The benefit of under-planting stand types | ||
97 | with a greater residual spruce component depends on the distribution | 97 | with a greater residual spruce component depends on the distribution | ||
98 | of canopy and understory trees at the time of | 98 | of canopy and understory trees at the time of | ||
99 | planting.\r\n\r\nDelaying under\u00adplanting until pine snags | 99 | planting.\r\n\r\nDelaying under\u00adplanting until pine snags | ||
100 | transmit more light to the understory (5\u00ad15 years after attack) | 100 | transmit more light to the understory (5\u00ad15 years after attack) | ||
101 | may result in higher survival and subsequent volume development. This | 101 | may result in higher survival and subsequent volume development. This | ||
102 | effect highlights the importance of considering changing overstory | 102 | effect highlights the importance of considering changing overstory | ||
103 | conditions when developing prescriptions to mitigate the effect of the | 103 | conditions when developing prescriptions to mitigate the effect of the | ||
104 | mountain pine beetle. However when considering under\u00adplanting, | 104 | mountain pine beetle. However when considering under\u00adplanting, | ||
105 | the improved light environment must be balanced against the safety | 105 | the improved light environment must be balanced against the safety | ||
106 | hazards posed by snags and the increased levels of brush and other | 106 | hazards posed by snags and the increased levels of brush and other | ||
107 | competing natural regeneration that will also take advantage of | 107 | competing natural regeneration that will also take advantage of | ||
108 | steadily improving light levels.", | 108 | steadily improving light levels.", | ||
109 | "num_resources": 1, | 109 | "num_resources": 1, | ||
110 | "num_tags": 9, | 110 | "num_tags": 9, | ||
111 | "organization": { | 111 | "organization": { | ||
112 | "approval_status": "approved", | 112 | "approval_status": "approved", | ||
113 | "created": "2023-06-05T23:48:49.201189", | 113 | "created": "2023-06-05T23:48:49.201189", | ||
114 | "description": "The Bulkley Valley Research Centre (BVRC) is an | 114 | "description": "The Bulkley Valley Research Centre (BVRC) is an | ||
115 | independent, not-for-profit society conducting high-quality, | 115 | independent, not-for-profit society conducting high-quality, | ||
116 | interdisciplinary research on natural and cultural resources. We | 116 | interdisciplinary research on natural and cultural resources. We | ||
117 | create learning and extension opportunities for both our members and | 117 | create learning and extension opportunities for both our members and | ||
118 | the community through workshops, conferences and other networking | 118 | the community through workshops, conferences and other networking | ||
119 | events, and support our community by promoting the region and | 119 | events, and support our community by promoting the region and | ||
120 | investing locally. Our purpose is to provide the science required for | 120 | investing locally. Our purpose is to provide the science required for | ||
121 | sustainable resource management.", | 121 | sustainable resource management.", | ||
122 | "id": "728a45c8-b5de-4138-832b-ef35f91e372b", | 122 | "id": "728a45c8-b5de-4138-832b-ef35f91e372b", | ||
123 | "image_url": "2024-02-15-231537.866013bvrc-logo.png", | 123 | "image_url": "2024-02-15-231537.866013bvrc-logo.png", | ||
124 | "is_organization": true, | 124 | "is_organization": true, | ||
125 | "name": "bulkley-valley-research-centre", | 125 | "name": "bulkley-valley-research-centre", | ||
126 | "state": "active", | 126 | "state": "active", | ||
127 | "title": "Bulkley Valley Research Centre", | 127 | "title": "Bulkley Valley Research Centre", | ||
128 | "type": "organization" | 128 | "type": "organization" | ||
129 | }, | 129 | }, | ||
130 | "owner_org": "728a45c8-b5de-4138-832b-ef35f91e372b", | 130 | "owner_org": "728a45c8-b5de-4138-832b-ef35f91e372b", | ||
131 | "private": false, | 131 | "private": false, | ||
132 | "publication_yr": "2005", | 132 | "publication_yr": "2005", | ||
133 | "relationships_as_object": [], | 133 | "relationships_as_object": [], | ||
134 | "relationships_as_subject": [], | 134 | "relationships_as_subject": [], | ||
135 | "resources": [ | 135 | "resources": [ | ||
136 | { | 136 | { | ||
137 | "cache_last_updated": null, | 137 | "cache_last_updated": null, | ||
138 | "cache_url": null, | 138 | "cache_url": null, | ||
139 | "created": "2024-03-21T21:48:10.832070", | 139 | "created": "2024-03-21T21:48:10.832070", | ||
140 | "datastore_active": false, | 140 | "datastore_active": false, | ||
n | 141 | "description": "Technical report titled \u201cImplications of | n | 141 | "description": "This technical report, prepared in 2005, |
142 | Alternative Silvicultural Strategies in Mountain Pine Beetle Damaged | 142 | incorporates robust snag dynamics into SORTIE-ND to predict impacts of | ||
143 | Stands\u201d prepared in 2005.", | 143 | silviculture strategies on mountain pine beetle (MPB) attacked | ||
144 | stands.", | ||||
144 | "format": "PDF", | 145 | "format": "PDF", | ||
145 | "hash": "", | 146 | "hash": "", | ||
146 | "id": "d13e3048-431e-4212-b84b-74f0a1b10100", | 147 | "id": "d13e3048-431e-4212-b84b-74f0a1b10100", | ||
147 | "last_modified": "2024-03-21T21:48:10.762810", | 148 | "last_modified": "2024-03-21T21:48:10.762810", | ||
t | 148 | "metadata_modified": "2024-03-21T21:48:11.149913", | t | 149 | "metadata_modified": "2024-04-05T17:59:15.699927", |
149 | "mimetype": "application/pdf", | 150 | "mimetype": "application/pdf", | ||
150 | "mimetype_inner": null, | 151 | "mimetype_inner": null, | ||
151 | "name": "Implications of Alternate Silvicultural Strategies in | 152 | "name": "Implications of Alternate Silvicultural Strategies in | ||
152 | Mountain Pine Beetle Damaged Stands", | 153 | Mountain Pine Beetle Damaged Stands", | ||
153 | "package_id": "c5cf39c1-f4d2-44a4-930a-77d35e19fffe", | 154 | "package_id": "c5cf39c1-f4d2-44a4-930a-77d35e19fffe", | ||
154 | "position": 0, | 155 | "position": 0, | ||
155 | "resource_type": null, | 156 | "resource_type": null, | ||
156 | "size": 734412, | 157 | "size": 734412, | ||
157 | "state": "active", | 158 | "state": "active", | ||
158 | "url": | 159 | "url": | ||
159 | a1b10100/download/04-04reportimplicationssilviculturalstrategies.pdf", | 160 | a1b10100/download/04-04reportimplicationssilviculturalstrategies.pdf", | ||
160 | "url_type": "upload" | 161 | "url_type": "upload" | ||
161 | } | 162 | } | ||
162 | ], | 163 | ], | ||
163 | "state": "active", | 164 | "state": "active", | ||
164 | "tags": [ | 165 | "tags": [ | ||
165 | { | 166 | { | ||
166 | "display_name": "2005", | 167 | "display_name": "2005", | ||
167 | "id": "863a9bac-ac53-4096-8d40-abbd2ed6ab24", | 168 | "id": "863a9bac-ac53-4096-8d40-abbd2ed6ab24", | ||
168 | "name": "2005", | 169 | "name": "2005", | ||
169 | "state": "active", | 170 | "state": "active", | ||
170 | "vocabulary_id": null | 171 | "vocabulary_id": null | ||
171 | }, | 172 | }, | ||
172 | { | 173 | { | ||
173 | "display_name": "forest stand dynamics", | 174 | "display_name": "forest stand dynamics", | ||
174 | "id": "be1e89d5-6a70-43f2-99b2-f8a99e60b85c", | 175 | "id": "be1e89d5-6a70-43f2-99b2-f8a99e60b85c", | ||
175 | "name": "forest stand dynamics", | 176 | "name": "forest stand dynamics", | ||
176 | "state": "active", | 177 | "state": "active", | ||
177 | "vocabulary_id": null | 178 | "vocabulary_id": null | ||
178 | }, | 179 | }, | ||
179 | { | 180 | { | ||
180 | "display_name": "lodgepole pine", | 181 | "display_name": "lodgepole pine", | ||
181 | "id": "d6637b9e-54d4-484d-897e-a28ed41bba05", | 182 | "id": "d6637b9e-54d4-484d-897e-a28ed41bba05", | ||
182 | "name": "lodgepole pine", | 183 | "name": "lodgepole pine", | ||
183 | "state": "active", | 184 | "state": "active", | ||
184 | "vocabulary_id": null | 185 | "vocabulary_id": null | ||
185 | }, | 186 | }, | ||
186 | { | 187 | { | ||
187 | "display_name": "modelling", | 188 | "display_name": "modelling", | ||
188 | "id": "2e4c8d2d-9f19-47eb-9de7-f81e4354835d", | 189 | "id": "2e4c8d2d-9f19-47eb-9de7-f81e4354835d", | ||
189 | "name": "modelling", | 190 | "name": "modelling", | ||
190 | "state": "active", | 191 | "state": "active", | ||
191 | "vocabulary_id": null | 192 | "vocabulary_id": null | ||
192 | }, | 193 | }, | ||
193 | { | 194 | { | ||
194 | "display_name": "mountain pine beetle", | 195 | "display_name": "mountain pine beetle", | ||
195 | "id": "96513657-0f80-4bad-81aa-9047329c8a02", | 196 | "id": "96513657-0f80-4bad-81aa-9047329c8a02", | ||
196 | "name": "mountain pine beetle", | 197 | "name": "mountain pine beetle", | ||
197 | "state": "active", | 198 | "state": "active", | ||
198 | "vocabulary_id": null | 199 | "vocabulary_id": null | ||
199 | }, | 200 | }, | ||
200 | { | 201 | { | ||
201 | "display_name": "silviculture", | 202 | "display_name": "silviculture", | ||
202 | "id": "e4e9d54c-c84b-4c89-b14f-a811d868a470", | 203 | "id": "e4e9d54c-c84b-4c89-b14f-a811d868a470", | ||
203 | "name": "silviculture", | 204 | "name": "silviculture", | ||
204 | "state": "active", | 205 | "state": "active", | ||
205 | "vocabulary_id": null | 206 | "vocabulary_id": null | ||
206 | }, | 207 | }, | ||
207 | { | 208 | { | ||
208 | "display_name": "sortie-nd", | 209 | "display_name": "sortie-nd", | ||
209 | "id": "5ea4d90a-de06-4400-9fdc-65cf95bd3a9e", | 210 | "id": "5ea4d90a-de06-4400-9fdc-65cf95bd3a9e", | ||
210 | "name": "sortie-nd", | 211 | "name": "sortie-nd", | ||
211 | "state": "active", | 212 | "state": "active", | ||
212 | "vocabulary_id": null | 213 | "vocabulary_id": null | ||
213 | }, | 214 | }, | ||
214 | { | 215 | { | ||
215 | "display_name": "spatially explicit models", | 216 | "display_name": "spatially explicit models", | ||
216 | "id": "bd544895-686d-4f09-a550-0b50b6cb8562", | 217 | "id": "bd544895-686d-4f09-a550-0b50b6cb8562", | ||
217 | "name": "spatially explicit models", | 218 | "name": "spatially explicit models", | ||
218 | "state": "active", | 219 | "state": "active", | ||
219 | "vocabulary_id": null | 220 | "vocabulary_id": null | ||
220 | }, | 221 | }, | ||
221 | { | 222 | { | ||
222 | "display_name": "spruce", | 223 | "display_name": "spruce", | ||
223 | "id": "cb352b9c-8849-42af-ae79-e035c5b3f953", | 224 | "id": "cb352b9c-8849-42af-ae79-e035c5b3f953", | ||
224 | "name": "spruce", | 225 | "name": "spruce", | ||
225 | "state": "active", | 226 | "state": "active", | ||
226 | "vocabulary_id": null | 227 | "vocabulary_id": null | ||
227 | } | 228 | } | ||
228 | ], | 229 | ], | ||
229 | "title": "Implications of Alternate Silvicultural Strategies in | 230 | "title": "Implications of Alternate Silvicultural Strategies in | ||
230 | Mountain Pine Beetle Damaged Stands", | 231 | Mountain Pine Beetle Damaged Stands", | ||
231 | "type": "dataset", | 232 | "type": "dataset", | ||
232 | "url": "", | 233 | "url": "", | ||
233 | "version": "" | 234 | "version": "" | ||
234 | } | 235 | } |